Where are the Armed Forces?
Tuesday this week
greeted Nigeria with horror when sixty harmless and hapless boy-students of the
Federal Government College, Bunu Yadi, in Yobe State were sent to early graves
in the most heinous of circumstances – a sad and even more dreadful reminder to
the same barbarity that took place last September at a College of Agriculture
in the same State. Their slaughterers reportedly set their dormitory alight and
then went ahead to either hack down, with machetes, or slit the throats of all
those tried to escape being roasted to death in the fire. As for the female
students, they were said to have been set free with a clear instruction to go
back home and get married. Without any confirmation of responsibility for the
attack, it bears every hallmark of the Boko Haram insurgents. Yet this remains
only speculatory until there is such confirmation, either from the Nigerian
security system of from the perpetrators themselves.
But to begin to
worry about who the real perpetrators are and what their reasons are for
attacking and killing these unarmed lads, and indeed their motives, is not what
I seek here. For if indeed it is the insurgents, as suspected and is most
likely, then their motives are probably pretty well known. Moreover, whoever
would commit these acts is a renegade and the Nigerian state does not pay anyone
to be a renegade and to put the lives of citizens in danger. On the contrary,
people are paid and structures are set up to deter renegades; because there
will always be renegades and criminals. It is a matter of expediency,
therefore, to pose the question: where are the structures put in place with all
the people so “well armed, paid and motivated” to protect Nigerians from the
onslaught of renegades?
It was reported
that shortly before the attack, the soldiers at a check point close to the
school were withdrawn, or is it nowhere to be seen? The Yobe State Governor,
Alh Geidam, while commenting to newsmen, when he visited the scene, lamented
the fact that for the about five hours that the killers operated, they had a
field day, with no security intervention whatsoever. The import of this is
clearer when one considers the fact that Yobe, along with Borno and Adamawa
States, has been under emergency rule since May last year.
About ten days
earlier, it had been a killing spree in Borno State, from Konduga to Bama and
other towns, leaving hundreds dead. Probably out of frustration and despair or
just stating mere facts, Gov Shettima decried that the insurgents were far
better armed and motivated than the Nigerian military. The response from the
presidency was rather shocking: the poor governor was excoriated and called
names. By the last Sunday, we saw screaming headlines that he might be replaced
with a military administrator. Despite denials from the presidency, the
President, Dr Jonathan, would make comments on Monday in response to Shettima’s
claim that one finds rather ghastly. He said if Shettima thought that the
military was not doing enough in his state then they will be withdrawn for a month, and it will be left to be seen if the he will remain in the Government
House. Jonathan went ahead to add that if the governor is not there after the
one month, then the military would summarily take over the state. That
statement is also quite a give-away!
The truth is that
the president is not the one on ground in those states even if he commands the
security structure ultimately. If therefore the governors on ground make such
statements as those by Gov Shettima, they must not be trivialized on the
platter of politics. What it implies is either that the security budget is
insufficient or is not properly deployed to execute this war on terror. However,
Nigerians believe that the vote is more than enough, which leaves the second
scenario. The expectation is that if Jonathan believes that he is doing more
than enough and, yet, is hearing something else from the field, then he should
look inward and ask more questions of the campaign rather than the kind of
responses we saw.
If, for example,
you employ a guard to watch over your property and yet thieves break in and
rob, the first person to answer to any query is the security guard. You would
not worry much about the robbers for they will always be there, which is why in
the first place you pay the guard to keep watch.
If the above
analogy is anything to go by, then we, Nigerians, must ask the President and
the armed forces, of which he is commander-in-chief: why are defenseless
Nigerians being continually slaughtered without any resistance from the
military in states that have been under a state of emergency for almost a year?
(Published on BLUEPRINT Newspaper, Thur Feb 27, 2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment